Tesla Defends Against DMV's False Advertising Allegations

Claims DMV case violates its free speech rights and points to agency's past inaction on Autopilot and Full Self-Driving Capability branding

Tesla is defending against allegations from the California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) that it falsely advertised its Autopilot and Full Self-Driving features, arguing that the DMV's case is invalid under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I, Section 2, of the California Constitution.
Tesla's lawyers argue that the DMV's case should be dismissed because it restricts Tesla's 'truthful and non-misleading speech' about its vehicles and their features.
Tesla also claims that the DMV has been aware of how Tesla has been using the brand names Autopilot and Full Self-Driving Capability since 2014 and 2016 respectively, and never indicated that these brand names or its advertising were problematic.
The DMV has previously investigated Tesla's ADAS advertising in 2014 and 2017 and decided not to take action.
If the DMV wins its case, Tesla's California manufacturer's license could be revoked, and the company could be required to pay restitution to those who have suffered financial loss or damage.