Overview
- Magistrate Felipe de la Mata’s project concludes there is no proof that Morena financed vote guides or that voters used them in a way that endangered the freedom of the vote.
- The case file logs 87 physical and 225 digital guides plus social posts, videos and news links, which the draft classifies as private or technical evidence without full probative value.
- The project finds no demonstrated participation by federal officials, Servidores de la Nación or Morena, and it says responsibility for any alleged coordinated strategy is unproven.
- The draft rejects additional claims over the absence of voting from abroad and by people in pretrial detention, noting the Sala Superior had already ruled it technically unfeasible in this process.
- The plenary is set to vote Wednesday, and validation would uphold INE certificates for Celia Maya, Eva Verónica de Gyves, Bernardo Bátiz, Indira Isabel García and Rufino H. León while dismissing assertions of paid social media promotion for lack of evidence.