Supreme Court's Presidential Immunity Ruling Sparks Debate
Recent decision on presidential immunity raises questions about executive power and legal accountability.
- The ruling grants former presidents immunity for actions within their constitutional authority.
- Chief Justice John Roberts emphasized the need to prevent political retribution between administrations.
- Dissenting justices argue the decision undermines the principle that no one is above the law.
- Legal experts express concern over the potential for abuse of presidential powers.
- The ruling has prompted widespread criticism from various legal and political commentators.