Supreme Court's Presidential Immunity Decision Sparks Controversy
Legal experts warn of potential threats to democracy following ruling on immunity for presidential acts.
- The Supreme Court ruled that presidents have presumptive immunity from prosecution for official acts.
- Critics argue the decision undermines accountability and could lead to abuses of power.
- Concerns are raised about the potential for a president to use law enforcement against political opponents.
- The decision has prompted calls for a constitutional amendment to restore accountability.
- Some believe the ruling could influence the upcoming presidential election.

































