Supreme Court's Landmark Rulings Reshape Presidential Immunity and Regulatory Oversight

Recent decisions grant broad protections for presidential actions while curbing agency powers, sparking debate on democratic integrity.

The Supreme Court ruled that presidents are immune from criminal prosecution for official acts, raising concerns about potential abuses of power.
A significant decision overturned the Chevron doctrine, limiting courts' deference to agency interpretations of ambiguous laws.
Legal experts warn that the immunity ruling could enable future presidents to bypass legal constraints, affecting democratic processes.
The White House criticized the rulings, while Congressional Republicans largely supported them.
Trump's legal team is leveraging the immunity ruling to challenge his recent convictions.