Supreme Court Upholds South Carolina Congressional Map in Key Redistricting Case

The 6-3 decision underscores the complexity of disentangling race and politics in gerrymandering disputes.

• The Supreme Court ruled against the NAACP's challenge to South Carolina's congressional map by a 6-3 vote.
• Justice Alito's majority opinion emphasized the difficulty of separating racial and partisan motivations in redistricting.
• The court maintained that state legislatures are primarily responsible for drawing districts, with a presumption of good faith.
• Justice Thomas's concurrence questioned the constitutionality of the Voting Rights Act in redistricting matters.
• The decision impacts the competitive seat held by Rep. Nancy Mace in South Carolina's District 1.

55 Articles

Fox News Vanity Fair Human Rights Watch Breitbart Newsweek Reason.com The Daily Beast Esquire PBS NewsHour People For the American Way SCOTUSblog Joe.My.God. Truthout The Daily Beast HuffPost UPI New York Daily News Denver Gazette Vox Rolling Stone The Guardian The Daily Signal Common Dreams New York Post Raw Story Newsweek Salon Voice of America (VOA News) ABC News Los Angeles Times Washington Examiner USA TODAY Forbes The Daily Caller TPM MSNBC The Hill Joe.My.God. Boston Globe Fox News The Guardian NBC News CNN Washington Post HuffPost CBS News Associated Press Orlando Sentinel The Daily Wire Democracy Docket Roll Call Mother Jones Post and Courier The New Republic The New Republic