Overview
- The Supreme Court quashed a criminal defamation case filed in 2016 by A Surti Developers against Mumbai homebuyers for erecting protest banners highlighting construction issues.
- The Court ruled that peaceful protests using temperate language are protected under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution and Exception 9 to Section 499 of the IPC.
- Justices K. V. Viswanathan and N. Kotiswar Singh emphasized that criminalizing such protests would constitute an abuse of legal process.
- The banners raised grievances over unaddressed construction defects, poor maintenance, and lack of society formation, without using offensive or defamatory language.
- This decision reinforces consumers’ rights to express dissatisfaction non-abusively, equating their right to protest with developers’ right to commercial speech.