Particle.news
Download on the App Store

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Army Officer Who Refused Regimental Temple, Gurdwara Entry

The bench said officers must lead by example, treating shared rituals as part of the force’s secular ethos.

Overview

  • The Supreme Court on November 25 affirmed the Delhi High Court order upholding Lieutenant Samuel Kamalesan’s termination for declining to enter the inner sanctums of his unit’s temple and gurdwara.
  • A bench of Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi called the conduct “the grossest kind of indiscipline” and said personal religious interpretations cannot govern behavior in uniform.
  • The court held that visible participation in troops’ rituals flows from the Army’s model of secularism and leadership by example, not from denominational endorsement.
  • Kamalesan, a Protestant commissioned in 2017, argued that entering another faith’s sanctum violated the Ten Commandments and said he otherwise joined regimental events, but the bench noted even a pastor had advised such entry was permissible.
  • The Army said repeated refusals despite counseling weakened cohesion in the 3rd Cavalry, which maintains both a temple and a gurdwara, while public reaction has ranged from concerns about individual conscience to support for the ruling as necessary for unit discipline.