Particle.news
Download on the App Store

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Army Officer Who Refused Regimental Shrine Entry

The judges ruled that constitutional religious freedom does not protect personal interpretations that conflict with the discipline and cohesion expected of military officers.

Overview

  • A bench of Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi on 25 November dismissed Lt. Samuel Kamalesan’s appeal, leaving intact a May Delhi High Court order upholding his 2021 termination.
  • The court said Article 25 safeguards only essential religious practices and noted that, under Article 33, service rules can limit individual claims to preserve armed forces discipline.
  • Calling his conduct the “grossest kind of indiscipline” and deeming him a “misfit” for the Army, the bench refused to reduce the penalty and said the outcome should “send a strong message.”
  • Kamalesan, commissioned in 2017 to the 3rd Cavalry’s Sikh-majority squadron, had declined to enter the sanctum of the unit’s temple and gurdwara or perform rituals, saying he would remain respectfully in the courtyard.
  • The Army told the courts he persisted despite repeated counselling, including advice from a pastor that entry would not breach Christian tenets, and that his stance threatened unit cohesion and morale, leading the Chief of Army Staff to find his retention undesirable.