Particle.news

Download on the App Store

Supreme Court to Review Constitutionality of Random Police Traffic Stops in Quebec

The case, initiated by Montrealer Joseph-Christopher Luamba, challenges racial profiling and revisits a 1990 precedent upholding random stops.

Image

Overview

  • The Supreme Court of Canada has granted Quebec leave to appeal a ruling that deemed random police traffic stops unconstitutional.
  • The case stems from claims by Joseph-Christopher Luamba, who reported being stopped nearly a dozen times without cause, highlighting systemic racial profiling concerns.
  • In 2022, Quebec Superior Court Justice Michel Yergeau ruled that random stops disproportionately harm Black Canadians, violating Charter rights, a decision upheld by the Quebec Court of Appeal in 2024.
  • The Supreme Court will reexamine the 1990 R. v. Ladouceur decision, which justified random stops under the Charter’s reasonable limits clause as essential for public safety checks.
  • Pending the Supreme Court's decision, Quebec has suspended most random stops, maintaining only structured checkpoints for specific safety measures like impaired driving checks.