Particle.news

Download on the App Store

Supreme Court to Review Challenge to New Jersey Attorney General’s Subpoena of Anti-Abortion Clinic

Justices will determine if the pro-life center can challenge Matthew Platkin’s demand for donor names in federal court instead of state proceedings.

A person rests in front of the US Supreme Court on June 5, 2025 in Washington, DC.
A view of the U.S. Supreme Court building on the first day of the court's new term in Washington, U.S. October 3, 2022.  REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst/File photo
Anti-abortion activists march and rally in front of the U.S. Supreme Court during the annual March for Life in Washington, D.C., on Jan. 19, 2024.
Image

Overview

  • Lower courts ruled First Choice Women’s Resource Centers’ federal lawsuit unripe and required it to raise constitutional objections in state court first.
  • The subpoena seeks a decade’s worth of internal documents, including donor lists, advertising materials and licensed medical personnel records as part of a consumer fraud investigation.
  • First Choice argues the demand chills free speech and association rights, warning that forcing state-court exhaustion creates a Catch-22 that bars federal review.
  • Enforcement of the subpoena is paused after a state court order, pending the Supreme Court’s decision on whether the group can pursue its First Amendment claims in federal court.
  • Represented by Alliance Defending Freedom and backed by conservative organizations, the case could redefine the boundary between state investigatory authority and First Amendment protections.