Particle.news
Download on the App Store

Supreme Court to Review Border 'Metering' and the Meaning of 'Arrives in the U.S.'

The decision will define whether asylum law covers people stopped on the Mexican side of a port of entry.

Overview

  • The justices granted review in Noem v. Al Otro Lado, taking up a challenge to the Ninth Circuit’s 2–1 ruling that migrants who encounter U.S. officers at ports of entry have “arrived” even if still in Mexico.
  • The Trump administration argues that “arrives in” requires entry onto U.S. soil and says it wants to preserve the option to reinstate metering during surges.
  • Plaintiffs contend the dispute has little current impact because metering was rescinded in 2021 and most processing now occurs through appointments.
  • A divided Ninth Circuit declined rehearing, as dissenting judges warned the panel’s reading improperly applies U.S. law extraterritorially and conflicts with statutory text.
  • The Supreme Court is expected to hear arguments next term and issue a decision by the end of June 2026.