Overview
- The justices will hear back-to-back arguments on Jan. 13 in Little v. Hecox (Idaho) and West Virginia v. B.P.J. challenging state bans on transgender girls playing on girls’ teams.
- Lower courts curtailed both laws, with the Fourth Circuit ruling West Virginia’s ban violates Title IX and the Ninth Circuit keeping Idaho’s ban on hold for the Boise State plaintiff.
- Idaho challenger Lindsay Hecox asked the Court to dismiss her case as moot, and the justices deferred that request until after argument.
- West Virginia and Idaho officials defend their statutes as fairness and safety measures, while the ACLU contends the laws are sex-based discrimination under Title IX and the Equal Protection Clause.
- The cases arrive as federal policy shifted under a 2025 Trump executive order and an NCAA rule limiting women’s competition to athletes assigned female at birth, with NCAA testimony noting fewer than 10 transgender college athletes and a decision expected by late June.