Overview
- On June 30, the Court granted review of a suit brought by the National Republican Senatorial and Congressional Committees, Vice President J.D. Vance and former Rep. Steve Chabot against coordinated spending limits.
- Challengers argue that caps on party coordination with candidates violate the First Amendment by restricting core political speech.
- The Justice Department filed a brief supporting the Republican petitioners and asked the Court to appoint independent counsel to defend the law.
- The Democratic National Committee and its Senate and House campaign arms intervened to uphold limits first enacted in the 1971 Federal Election Campaign Act and affirmed by the high court in 2001.
- Oral arguments will be heard in the October term and a ruling is expected by June 2026, a decision poised to influence party spending and donor strategies for the 2026 elections.