Particle.news

Download on the App Store

Supreme Court to Hear Case on Dreadlock-Shaving Damages for Rastafarian Inmate

This dispute over RLUIPA interpretation will determine if inmates can obtain money damages for religious rights violations.

Rastafarian Damon Landor before and after having his dreadlocks shaved off at Raymond Laborde Correction Center in Louisiana.
The U.S. Supreme Court building in Washington, U.S., June 1, 2024.
People gather outside the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, U.S., June 29, 2024. REUTERS/Kevin Mohatt/File Photo
Image

Overview

  • After lower courts ruled money damages are unavailable under RLUIPA, the Supreme Court agreed on June 23 to resolve the dispute in its next term.
  • Damon Landor, who had upheld a religious vow not to cut his dreadlocks for nearly 20 years, was handcuffed and forcibly shaved at Raymond Laborde Correction Center after officials discarded a 2017 ruling allowing such accommodations.
  • Solicitor General D. John Sauer urged the Court to intervene, arguing that damages liability is necessary to ensure that federally funded institutions do not substantially burden inmates' religious exercise.
  • Louisiana Attorney General Elizabeth Murrill acknowledged Landor's mistreatment and revised the prison's grooming policy, but she contends that RLUIPA does not permit monetary relief.
  • Landor's team points to a 2020 Supreme Court decision under the similar Religious Freedom Restoration Act, and a favorable ruling could expand accountability for religious rights violations behind bars.