Supreme Court to Hear Case on Damages for Rastafarian Inmate Over Forced Haircut
The dispute tests whether RLUIPA allows personal‑liability suits against state prison officials.
Overview
- The justices will hear arguments on November 10 in Damon Landor’s bid to recover money damages after Louisiana guards shaved his knee‑length dreadlocks.
- Landor says officers handcuffed him to a chair and cut his hair after discarding a ruling accommodating religious dreadlocks, although two prior prisons had recognized that accommodation.
- The Department of Justice and an unusual coalition of religious and civil‑liberties groups, including the ACLU and Alliance Defending Freedom, filed briefs supporting Landor.
- Louisiana contends RLUIPA does not permit damages against individual officers and warns of staffing and operational consequences, noting the state has since revised its grooming policy.
- The government argues a damages remedy would not unleash frivolous suits because the Prison Litigation Reform Act and qualified immunity already screen weak claims.