Overview
- The opinion will be pronounced on Thursday by a five-judge Constitution Bench led by Chief Justice BR Gavai.
- The bench reserved its view on September 11 after ten days of hearings featuring arguments from the Union and several states.
- The Article 143 reference followed an April ruling in the Tamil Nadu Governor case that set deadlines and even ordered deemed assent for certain bills.
- The Attorney General and Solicitor General opposed court-fixed timelines, arguing such directives would breach separation of powers.
- States including Tamil Nadu, Kerala, West Bengal, and Punjab questioned the need for the reference and warned that indefinite withholding of bills by governors undermines elected governments.