Particle.news

Download on the App Store

Supreme Court Takes Up Colorado Conversion-Therapy Ban in Free-Speech Test

The justices will weigh whether Colorado's limits on conversion therapy regulate professional care or censor therapists' speech.

Overview

  • Oral arguments in Chiles v. Salazar are set for Tuesday, with a Colorado Springs counselor challenging the state's 2019 law as a First Amendment violation.
  • Kaley Chiles, represented by the Alliance Defending Freedom, says the ban chills her counseling speech and amounts to viewpoint discrimination in sessions with minors.
  • Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser defends the statute as a patient-protection rule for licensed professionals, citing broad medical consensus that conversion therapy is harmful.
  • A federal district court and the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the law, and a ruling now could affect similar restrictions in more than 20 states and reshape regulation of professional advice.
  • The Trump administration will support Chiles at argument, continuing a broader clash over LGBTQ protections that has repeatedly placed Colorado before the Supreme Court.