Overview
- A bench of Justices Sanjay Kumar and Alok Aradhe set aside the Chhattisgarh High Court’s orders and quashed three tenders for school sports kits.
- The invalidated clause required proof of at least ₹6 crore in supplies to Chhattisgarh state agencies within the past three years, narrowing the field for contracts worth about ₹40 crore.
- The court held the state-only past-performance requirement violated Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) and offended the doctrine of a level playing field.
- Judges rejected the state’s Maoist-affected justification as untenable for a non-sensitive supply, noting only some districts face such issues and logistics can be handled through local chains.
- The ruling warns that place-bound criteria foster cartelisation and directs the state to reframe tender conditions with a rational nexus to the contract and open competition.