Overview
- In a rare move, the justices ordered reargument and broadened the case to test whether creating majority‑minority districts violates the 14th and 15th Amendments.
- During questioning, the conservative majority pressed whether race‑based remedies need an endpoint and explored proposals that would raise plaintiffs’ burdens in Section 2 cases.
- Justice Brett Kavanaugh emerged as a pivotal voice, while the court’s liberals defended Section 2 as a tool to remedy discriminatory map effects without requiring proof of intent.
- The dispute centers on Louisiana’s 2024 Shreveport‑to‑Baton Rouge district used in the last election; the state switched sides to oppose the map, and the Trump administration urged tighter standards.
- Analysts say weakening Section 2 could reduce minority‑opportunity districts and shift House seats toward Republicans, with estimates commonly ranging from about a dozen to roughly 19, and a ruling is expected by June 2026.