Particle.news
Download on the App Store

Supreme Court Signals Limits on Voting Rights Act’s Section 2 in Louisiana Map Case

Conservative questions at reargument suggest tighter rules on Section 2 could arrive in time to shape 2026 maps.

Overview

  • In a rare move, the justices ordered reargument and broadened the case to test whether creating majority‑minority districts violates the 14th and 15th Amendments.
  • During questioning, the conservative majority pressed whether race‑based remedies need an endpoint and explored proposals that would raise plaintiffs’ burdens in Section 2 cases.
  • Justice Brett Kavanaugh emerged as a pivotal voice, while the court’s liberals defended Section 2 as a tool to remedy discriminatory map effects without requiring proof of intent.
  • The dispute centers on Louisiana’s 2024 Shreveport‑to‑Baton Rouge district used in the last election; the state switched sides to oppose the map, and the Trump administration urged tighter standards.
  • Analysts say weakening Section 2 could reduce minority‑opportunity districts and shift House seats toward Republicans, with estimates commonly ranging from about a dozen to roughly 19, and a ruling is expected by June 2026.