Particle.news
Download on the App Store

Supreme Court Shields Lawyer–Client Privilege, Limits Probes’ Power to Summon Advocates

The bench anchored privilege in enforceable safeguards requiring superintendent-level approval for any summons to counsel.

Overview

  • Investigating agencies may not call practising advocates over client advice except under narrow exceptions in Section 132 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam.
  • Any summons to a lawyer must spell out the specific facts relied on, carry written clearance from a superior not below superintendent rank, and is open to challenge under the BNSS.
  • The court quashed Enforcement Directorate notices to senior lawyers Arvind Datar and Pratap Venugopal issued in a money-laundering probe.
  • Lawyers’ digital devices must be produced before the jurisdictional court, with notice to the lawyer and client and supervised decryption or extraction in their presence to protect other clients’ confidentiality.
  • The ruling preserves exceptions for criminal complicity, excludes in-house counsel from Section 132’s privilege (with limited protection under Section 134), and sets a uniform protocol for all agencies beyond the ED’s internal curb.