Particle.news
Download on the App Store

Supreme Court Sets Aside MP Judge’s Dismissal, Limits Disciplinary Action for Judicial Errors

The ruling says erroneous bail orders alone cannot trigger departmental proceedings against trial court judges.

Overview

  • Justices JB Pardiwala and KV Vishwanathan allowed Nirbhay Singh Suliya’s appeal, overturning his termination as an Additional District and Sessions Judge.
  • The Court directed that Suliya be deemed in service until normal superannuation with full back wages and all consequential benefits, payable within eight weeks with 6% interest.
  • The judgment cautions High Courts against launching disciplinary action for mere errors of judgment, noting a chilling effect that discourages trial judges from granting bail.
  • The Bench ordered action against engineered or frivolous complaints, including possible contempt proceedings and references to Bar Councils when lawyers are involved.
  • The Court clarified that prima facie misconduct must still draw prompt disciplinary measures and, in appropriate cases, criminal prosecution to remove tainted judges.