Overview
- Oral arguments are scheduled for Wednesday in Louisiana v. Callais after the Supreme Court called for a rare reargument.
- Louisiana has shifted its stance to argue that race-based redistricting is unconstitutional, and the Trump Justice Department has filed in support of the state.
- A three-judge federal panel previously held that District 6 in the 2024 map (SB 8) violates the Equal Protection Clause and barred the map from future use.
- The court specifically asked whether intentionally creating a second majority‑minority district violates the Fourteenth or Fifteenth Amendments.
- Voting-rights experts and legal analysts warn the ruling could narrow or neutralize Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, with nationwide effects on redistricting and potential challenges to state voting-rights laws.