Supreme Court Sends Social Media Laws Back to Lower Courts
The decision leaves Florida and Texas laws restricting content moderation in limbo, highlighting ongoing debates over free speech and platform rights.
- The Supreme Court declined to rule on the constitutionality of state laws limiting social media content moderation.
- The cases involve laws from Florida and Texas aimed at preventing perceived anti-conservative bias on major platforms.
- The decision has been sent back to lower courts for further review and factual analysis.
- Tech industry trade groups and advocacy organizations have welcomed the Supreme Court's cautious approach.
- The ruling underscores the complexity of balancing free speech rights with the regulatory oversight of social media platforms.
Tech Xplore 
The Federalist 
The Dispatch 
National Constitution Center 
Al Jazeera 
CNN 
SCOTUSblog 
The Hill 
The Daily Signal 
SFist 
Denver Gazette 
NDTV 
Free Press 
The Register 
Tampa Bay Times 
Houston Public Media 
Voice of America (VOA News) 
Vox 
UPI 
Gizmodo 
Reason.com 
Business Insider Denver Gazette 
NBC News 
ReadWrite Reason.com 
CNBC 
TechCrunch Reason.com 
Los Angeles Times 
Techdirt 
Deadline 
Engadget 
The Guardian 
The Salt Lake Tribune 
The Post Millennial 
The Texas Tribune 
USA TODAY 
Washington Post 
The Verge The Verge 
The Daily Caller The Hill 
HuffPost 
Fox News 
New York Post 
Scripps News 
Financial Post 
Forbes 
Baltimore Sun 
Associated Press 
ABC News 
CBS News 
Semafor 
Roll Call Washington Post 
CNA CNA 
Breitbart 
The Conversation 
Salon 