Supreme Court Seems Poised to Uphold Consumer Watchdog Agency Against Industry Challenge
- The Supreme Court heard a case challenging the funding of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), created after the 2008 financial crisis.
- The CFPB is funded through the Federal Reserve rather than congressional appropriations, leading to claims it violates separation of powers.
- Both liberal and conservative justices expressed skepticism about arguments to eliminate the CFPB on constitutional grounds.
- A ruling against the CFPB could nullify its past actions and regulations, potentially causing market instability.
- The case was brought by payday lenders impacted by CFPB regulations, but could affect the mortgage market and other federal agencies.







































