Particle.news

Download on the App Store

Supreme Court Seeks Records in Rajasthan Royals–ited InIndia Insurance Dispute Over Sreesanth Claim

The bench pressed for proof of prior disclosure to test the insurer’s non-disclosure allegation.

Overview

  • Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta adjourned the case and directed United India Insurance to file the original insurance application and S Sreesanth’s medical fitness certificates.
  • The court asked why the policy was issued if a pre-existing toe injury was known, noting the insurer could have declined coverage or charged a higher premium.
  • Rajasthan Royals claim INR 82.80 lakh under a player-loss cover after Sreesanth suffered a knee injury in a Jaipur practice match shortly before the 2012 season.
  • United India Insurance, represented by Additional Solicitor General Aishwarya Bhati, argues the franchise failed to disclose a 2011 toe injury that could invalidate the claim.
  • The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission had earlier ruled in favor of the franchise, and the insurer’s appeal has brought the long-running matter to the Supreme Court.