Overview

• The Supreme Court upheld a federal law restricting gun ownership for individuals under domestic violence restraining orders.
• Justice Clarence Thomas was the lone dissenter, advocating for a strict originalist interpretation.
• The ruling suggests a potential shift away from rigid originalism towards a more flexible historical analysis.
• Justices offered various concurring opinions, highlighting the complexity and disagreement over Second Amendment interpretation.
• The case underscores ongoing tensions between gun rights and public safety concerns.