Supreme Court Ruling Against Union Makes Strikes Riskier
- The Supreme Court ruled against a union representing truck drivers who went on strike, making it easier for companies to sue over strikes that cause property damage.
- The ruling united liberal and conservative justices and was a loss for organized labor, which has faced several defeats at the Supreme Court in recent years.
- Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote for the majority that the union failed to take reasonable steps to prevent damage to the company's wet concrete.
- In her dissent, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson argued the decision would undermine the right to strike and complicate the development of labor law.
- Legal experts said the ruling would likely discourage some strikes and prompt unions to take precautions to avoid lawsuits, but that the overall impact remained unclear.