Supreme Court Rules Against Andy Warhol Foundation in Copyright Case Over Photograph of Prince
- The US Supreme Court ruled that Andy Warhol infringed on photographer Lynn Goldsmith's copyright when he created a series of silk screen images based on a photograph Goldsmith shot of the late musician Prince in 1981.
- The court rejected arguments that Warhol didn't violate copyright laws because he transformed Goldsmith's original shot.
- The ruling cracks down on "fair use" and protects photographers' rights to their work, even against famous artists.
- Justice Elena Kagan warned that the decision could stifle creativity and impede new art, music, literature, and ideas.
- The decision could set a precedent for cases involving the fair use doctrine, which allows limited appropriation of intellectual property for purposes such as scholarship, news reporting, and commentary.




























