Particle.news

Download on the App Store

Supreme Court Rules £80m Tax-Planning Transfer Remains Non-Marital Asset

The ruling maintains Anna Standish’s £25m settlement, sending the case back to the Family Court to evaluate her reasonable needs.

Image
Image
Police officers stand on duty outside the Supreme Court in Parliament Square, central London, Britain December 6, 2016. REUTERS/Toby Melville/File Photo
Image

Overview

  • Justices unanimously dismissed Anna Standish’s appeal, upholding the Court of Appeal finding that the 2017 transfer did not become matrimonial property.
  • The court held that Clive Standish’s transfer of around £77m was made solely for inheritance tax mitigation and the benefit of their children, not to create a shared asset.
  • Anna Standish’s award stays at £25m, reflecting only the proportion of funds deemed matrimonial property by the Court of Appeal.
  • The dispute will return to the Family Court for a determination of whether the £25m settlement satisfies Anna Standish’s reasonable financial needs.
  • Legal experts say the judgment underscores the importance of clear documentation of asset transfers, prenuptial terms and intentions in high-net-worth divorce and estate planning.