Particle.news

Download on the App Store

Supreme Court Revives Atlanta Family’s Suit After Mistaken FBI Raid

Unanimous ruling rejects the government’s immunity claims, remanding the dispute for lower court review of the FTCA’s discretionary-function exception.

FILE - Supreme Court is seen on Capitol Hill in Washington, April 25, 2024. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File)
Image
Image
Image

Overview

  • In October 2017, an FBI SWAT team broke down Trina Martin’s front door, deployed a flashbang grenade and held her, her then-partner Toi Cliatt and their seven-year-old son at gunpoint before realizing they had the wrong house.
  • Martin and Cliatt filed suit under the Federal Tort Claims Act in 2019 alleging assault, battery and false arrest, but a federal judge and the 11th Circuit dismissed the case citing qualified immunity and the Supremacy Clause.
  • Justice Neil Gorsuch’s majority opinion held that the FTCA, not the Supremacy Clause, is the proper framework for assessing federal agents’ liability and cleared the way for the family’s claims to proceed.
  • Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson joined a concurrence indicating that the FTCA’s discretionary-function exception may not shield the agents’ tactical decisions from suit.
  • On remand, the 11th Circuit must decide whether the discretionary-function exception bars the family’s negligent-or-intentional tort claims or if the lawsuit can advance to merits review.