Supreme Court Rejects Trump's Immunity Claim in Landmark Decision

The Supreme Court has ruled that former presidents do not have immunity from criminal prosecution for actions taken during their presidency, setting a significant legal precedent.

• The Supreme Court's decision impacts Donald Trump's legal battles, including his hush-money trial and efforts to overturn the 2020 election results.
• Mark Meadows, Trump's former chief of staff, also sought immunity for actions taken under Trump's direction but was denied.
• The ruling raises questions about the legal responsibilities of presidential subordinates and limits potential abuses of power.
• Justice Neil Gorsuch, a Trump appointee, highlighted the importance of subordinates facing legal consequences to prevent presidential misconduct.
• The decision is expected to influence future prosecutions of government officials and reshape the understanding of executive power.

31 Articles

The Hill Business Insider The Bulwark The Philadelphia Inquirer HuffPost Mediaite The New Republic Fox News The Post Millennial New York Post The Daily Wire Newsweek Washington Examiner Crooks and Liars Joe.My.God. Mediaite The Dispatch CNN CNN The Daily Wire The Hill Cleveland Plain Dealer The Salt Lake Tribune Breitbart Business Insider Los Angeles Times Breitbart Spectator Newsweek The Hill Raw Story