Particle.news

Download on the App Store

Supreme Court Rejects Challenge to High-Capacity Magazine Bans

By declining to hear the case, the court leaves in place laws that bar magazines above 10 rounds following lower-court findings that such devices present heightened public safety risks.

Guns are displayed at a booth during the National Rifle Association (NRA) annual meeting in Atlanta, Georgia, U.S. April 27, 2025. REUTERS/Jeenah Moon/File Photo
A salesperson holds a high capacity magazine for an AR-15 rifle at a store in Orem, Utah in 2021.

Overview

  • The Supreme Court’s 6-3 conservative majority refused to hear Hanson v. District of Columbia, preserving the D.C. felony ban on magazines that hold more than 10 rounds.
  • Justices turned away separate appeals of Rhode Island’s magazine restrictions and Maryland’s ban on assault-style weapons after falling one vote short of the four needed to grant review.
  • A federal trial court and the D.C. Circuit upheld the District’s restriction on grounds that large-capacity magazines are arms subject to regulation due to their increased lethality.
  • Gun owners who challenged the bans sought to expand the court’s 2022 Bruen decision on carrying rights to firearm accessories but failed to gain traction at the high court.
  • Advocacy groups including Everytown for Gun Safety and Giffords Law Center hailed the decision as an affirmation of states’ power to regulate accessories considered particularly dangerous.