Particle.news

Download on the App Store

Supreme Court Reinstates 3-Year Practice Rule for Judicial Service Exams

The new eligibility requirement applies prospectively, mandating courtroom experience and formal training for future judicial recruits.

“We hold that the three-year minimum practice requirement to appear for civil judges (junior division) exam is restored,” the Supreme Court said in the order.
Image
The Supreme Court mandated that a minimum practice of three years as an advocate is necessary for a candidate to apply for entry-level posts in judicial service. (File Photo)
Image

Overview

  • The Supreme Court of India has restored the minimum three-year legal practice requirement for candidates applying to entry-level judicial service posts.
  • The rule applies only to future recruitment cycles and excludes ongoing or already-initiated judicial hiring processes.
  • Candidates must certify their practice through endorsements from senior advocates with at least ten years of experience, and time spent as a law clerk will also be considered.
  • Judicial service entrants must complete one year of training before presiding over court cases, as part of broader reforms to ensure competence.
  • All High Courts and state governments are required to amend their judicial service rules within six months to comply with the Supreme Court's directive.