Particle.news

Download on the App Store

Supreme Court Questions Governor Bill Delays as Centre Opposes State Writs

The case stems from an April ruling that set deadlines for decisions on state bills.

Overview

  • Solicitor General Tushar Mehta said states lack standing under Article 32 and cited Article 361 immunity for the President and Governors.
  • He argued disputes should be pursued politically or via an original suit under Article 131, not through writs seeking directions on assent.
  • The Constitution Bench asked whether “as soon as possible” in Article 200 can be nullified by indefinite withholding and flagged delays of six months or more.
  • Tamil Nadu contended a Governor cannot become a “super chief minister” and is bound by ministerial advice, rejecting an open-ended veto.
  • The President’s Article 143 reference seeks the court’s view on timelines, justiciability and remedies after an April 8 verdict introduced fixed limits and “deemed assent,” with hearings set to continue.