Overview
- The bench set aside the Telangana High Court’s approval of the detention order and directed the detainee’s release unless required in another case.
- The judgment called the State’s invocation of preventive detention a colourable exercise of power aimed at nullifying the benefit of bail.
- The court stressed the distinction between law and order and public order, requiring a specific showing that the alleged conduct endangered public order.
- It found the detention order lacked recorded subjective satisfaction and merely reproduced statutory phrases without evidence.
- The ruling said registration of three NDPS cases is insufficient absent material showing the narcotic posed a danger to public health, and it pointed to ordinary remedies like bail cancellation for any fresh offences.