Overview
- The vacation bench led by Chief Justice Surya Kant kept the November 20 order and the MoEF&CC committee’s recommendations in abeyance after taking suo motu cognisance.
- Notices were issued to the Centre and the four Aravalli states, with the case listed for January 21, 2026 as the court moves to constitute a high‑powered panel of domain experts.
- The court framed key questions on whether the 100m/500m criteria narrow protected areas, create gaps, and permit regulated mining, and whether a geological inquiry is required.
- Implementation steps such as mapping under the new criteria and management planning are paused, while the ban on granting new mining leases continues pending further directions.
- The intervention follows protests and expert objections, including concerns from FSI and the CEC, with the court stressing the need for a fair, impartial, independent assessment before any policy moves.