Overview
- The court stayed its November 20 directions and the earlier committee’s recommendations, saying they were being misconstrued and require clarification.
- It proposed constituting a high‑powered committee of domain experts to reassess the definition of Aravalli hills and ranges and the ecological consequences.
- Notices were issued to the Union government and the four Aravalli states—Rajasthan, Haryana, Gujarat and Delhi—with responses sought in the suo motu case.
- The bench flagged questions on ecological continuity across 500‑metre gaps, parameters for any regulated mining, and whether reported mapping figures are scientifically sound.
- The environment ministry has already directed states to stop granting new mining leases in the Aravallis pending expert review and a sustainable mining plan.