Overview

• An official July 15 report identified about 2,560 discrepancies across 855 Supreme Court rulings posted online from 1948 to 2016.
• Most errors involved minor typographical mistakes in names or numbers and did not alter substantive legal meaning.
• Discrepancies were concentrated in older cases after external contractors delivered low-precision scans of vertical text and handwritten documents.
• The Supreme Court Secretariat admitted that previous quality-control measures were insufficient and emphasized the importance of safeguarding institutional credibility.
• The court has shifted its digital production processes internally and pledged ongoing reviews to promptly address any further inaccuracies.