Supreme Court Overturns Federal Ban on Bump Stocks
Ruling emphasizes legislative supremacy and textualism, sparking debate over gun control and judicial roles.
- The Court ruled 6-3 that the ATF exceeded its authority by classifying bump stocks as machine guns under federal law.
- Justice Clarence Thomas stated that bump stocks do not meet the statutory definition of machine guns.
- The decision has been met with significant controversy, with dissenting justices highlighting potential public safety risks.
- The ruling underscores a shift towards textualism and away from judicial activism under Chief Justice John Roberts.
- Critics argue the decision ignores the practical implications of bump stocks, which can enable rapid fire similar to machine guns.