Particle.news

Download on the App Store

Supreme Court Labels Petitions Against Vantara ‘Completely Vague’ and Allows Amendments

The court told petitioners to add Vantara as a respondent or first seek relief from the Central Zoo Authority before the August 25 hearing

Overview

  • A bench of Justices Pankaj Mithal and P B Varale criticised the petitions for failing to name Vantara as a party and lacking clear relief demands
  • The justices granted petitioners five days to amend their pleas and formally implead Vantara in the case
  • The court questioned why challenges to wildlife transfers were not first brought before the Central Zoo Authority or other regulatory bodies
  • A related petition was tagged to the proceedings and the matter was listed for further hearing on August 25
  • No substantive orders were issued on returning captive elephants or probing alleged irregularities, leaving Madhuri at the Reliance Foundation facility pending next steps