Overview
- The justices heard arguments Tuesday in Chiles v. Salazar, with the Trump administration urging the Court to view Colorado’s ban as a burden on speech.
- Colorado defends its 2019 law as a regulation of unsafe, ineffective treatment, carrying fines up to $5,000 and potential license penalties, and exempting religious ministries, with no sanctions reported to date.
- Kaley Chiles, a Christian counselor represented by Alliance Defending Freedom, argues the law censors faith-informed talk therapy and amounts to viewpoint discrimination.
- Major medical organizations, including the American Psychological Association and American Medical Association, denounce conversion therapy as harmful to minors, citing links to depression and suicidality.
- A circuit split frames the stakes: the 10th Circuit upheld Colorado’s law while the 11th Circuit struck similar bans, and a ruling could affect more than 20 states and define First Amendment limits on professional counseling.