Particle.news

Download on the App Store

Supreme Court Hears Challenge to Colorado’s Ban on Conversion Therapy for Minors

The case asks whether state limits on counselors’ efforts to change minors’ identity qualify as healthcare regulation rather than protected speech.

Overview

  • The Justice Department under President Trump participated in oral arguments backing counselor Kaley Chiles, saying the law suppresses one side of a professional debate.
  • Colorado defended its 2019 statute as targeting a predetermined treatment goal deemed unsafe and ineffective, applying only to licensed providers and exempting religious ministry, with fines and licensing sanctions possible.
  • More than two dozen states and Washington, D.C., have similar restrictions, so the ruling could affect conversion‑therapy bans across much of the country.
  • Lower courts split on the issue, with a district court and the 10th Circuit upholding Colorado’s law while the 11th Circuit struck down comparable bans, leading to Supreme Court review.
  • Major medical and mental‑health groups describe conversion efforts as discredited and linked to harms, while ADF, representing Chiles, has been accused in reporting of misrepresenting research it cited.