Particle.news

Download on the App Store

Supreme Court Hears Challenge to ACA’s Preventive Care Mandates

The case questions the constitutionality of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, with implications for millions’ access to no-cost screenings and treatments.

Pills used for HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP).
A sign on an insurance store advertises Obamacare in San Ysidro, San Diego, California, U.S., October 26, 2017. REUTERS/Mike Blake/File Photo
FILE - The Supreme Court is seen on Capitol Hill in Washington, Dec. 17, 2024. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File)
Image

Overview

  • The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on April 21, 2025, in Kennedy v. Braidwood Management, a case challenging the structure of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force under the Constitution’s Appointments Clause.
  • The plaintiffs argue that the 16-member task force, which recommends no-cost preventive care services, wields significant government power without Senate confirmation, violating the Constitution.
  • If the Court upholds lower court rulings, insurers could no longer be required to cover preventive services like cancer screenings, PrEP for HIV prevention, and statins without cost-sharing.
  • The Trump administration’s Justice Department is defending the ACA’s mandates, marking a reversal from its prior stance against the law during Trump’s first term.
  • A decision, expected by late June, could also determine whether HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. gains greater authority over task force recommendations and preventive care policies.