Supreme Court Halts EPA's Cross-State Air Pollution Rule
The 5-4 decision temporarily blocks the Biden administration's plan to reduce ozone pollution while legal challenges proceed.
- The Supreme Court's stay affects 23 states, primarily targeting power plants and industrial sources of ozone.
- Justice Neil Gorsuch, writing for the majority, questioned the EPA's cost-effectiveness analysis.
- Justice Amy Coney Barrett, in dissent, argued that the EPA had sufficiently justified its plan.
- The EPA's rule aimed to help downwind states meet national air quality standards.
- The case will continue in the D.C. Circuit Court, with potential hearings in the fall.


































