Supreme Court Grants Presidential Immunity, Igniting Debate on Executive Power
Ruling shields presidents from criminal prosecution for official acts, raising concerns about accountability and separation of powers.
- The Supreme Court ruled that presidents have substantial immunity from prosecution for official acts, but not for unofficial acts.
- Chief Justice Roberts emphasized the need for a powerful executive, while dissenting justices warned of potential abuses of power.
- The decision has significant implications for former President Trump, delaying his trial related to the January 6th Capitol riot.
- Critics argue the ruling undermines the principle that no one is above the law and could lead to unchecked presidential authority.
- The court's decision comes amid broader concerns about its ideological leanings and public confidence in its impartiality.



























































































































































































































































































































































































































































