Overview
- An official July 15 report identified about 2,560 typographical errors across 855 rulings published online for cases from 1948 to 2016.
- Most mistakes involved misspellings, punctuation mishaps and incorrect numbers, and none altered the substantive meaning of the decisions.
- Errors concentrated in decades-old documents that external contractors scanned under low-accuracy conditions and faced insufficient quality checks.
- Since October 2021, the court has reviewed its precedent archive and now handles all digitization internally to improve quality control.
- The court vowed to correct future discrepancies on its website or in published case compilations as soon as they are detected.