Supreme Court Faces Ethics Questions Over Undisclosed Gifts and Non-Recusals
- Supreme Court facing calls to adopt an ethics code following reports a Republican donor gave undisclosed gifts to Justice Clarence Thomas
- All nine justices signed a statement promising to explain non-participation in cases but two justices did not disclose reasons for bowing out of appeals
- Justice Elena Kagan cited previous job preventing her from hearing an appeal; Justice Samuel Alito likely avoided an energy appeal due to stock ownership
- Criticism stems from revelations a Dallas billionaire provided undisclosed gifts and travel to Justice Clarence Thomas and his wife
- The high court's ethics are under scrutiny as some demand more disclosure and question close ties between justices and partisan donors