Supreme Court Ethics Code Lacks Enforcement After Internal Debate
Leaked discussions reveal deep divisions among justices over enforceability of new ethics guidelines, with conservatives resisting binding measures.
- Leaked memos and discussions show the Supreme Court's recent ethics code lacks enforcement mechanisms, following significant internal disagreement.
- Justices Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson supported enforceable rules, with Kagan proposing a non-punitive advisory panel of federal judges, which was ultimately rejected.
- Justice Gorsuch strongly opposed enforceable measures, arguing they could undermine judicial independence, with Alito and Thomas expressing similar concerns.
- Chief Justice Roberts sought a compromise to address public criticism over ethics controversies, but the final code remained voluntary and non-binding.
- The leaks highlight ongoing tensions within the court and raise questions about transparency and accountability in the judiciary.