Overview
- A bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi dismissed the petition after hearing the petitioner, a third-year law student, in person.
- The judges said the filing sought popularity and described the petitioner as “media crazy.”
- The court recorded that the plea was cryptic, incomplete, and misdirected, with no clear explanation of personal grievance.
- Justice Surya Kant warned of exemplary costs and adverse remarks and told the student to first complete his law degree.
- The case, titled HARRY JOSEPH v. Union of India (Diary No. 30747-2025), targeted the Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Order, 1950.